Tuesday, April 15, 2014
Surprised by Friendliness
A couple of weeks ago I went for my walk and was surprised by a very unusual display of friendliness. Something happened that I have not encountered in at least fifteen years. As I was walking, a police car approached on the same road, with two police officers: one was driving; the other, in the right front seat, seemed to be taking notes or examining something. As they drew near I looked at them and made eye contact and the one on the passenger side waved to me.
Wow! I have not encountered this in well over a decade!
In times past, I nearly always waved to the police. I counted the police officers as public servants, as my friends who devoted their lives to me and the rest of the community, serving to help keep us all safe. Twenty years ago I would not have thought it a wonderful surprise to have a police officer wave to me, especially not in response to my initial show of friendship and confidence. But that was many years ago.
Since then I have stopped waving. After about a decade of waving with no friendly response whatsoever from any of the officers to whom I waved, sometimes even encountering a scowl instead of the friendly smile and wave that I expected in return, I gave up waving.
In fact, I have actually become afraid of waving to them. Whereas I previously looked to the police with trust, I now fear them. I many times in the past ten years have called 911 to report people on the busy expressways who were in need of assistance. Since such busy expressways are not appropriate places for a person without flashing lights and the authority to redirect traffic to attempt such things, I have called for those properly equipped. But after a number of years of attempting to be of service as a good and caring citizen, I became aware that I was drawing attention to myself. I was making myself known to those who track such things.
An example is when a fellow had an extension ladder fall off his truck and block portions of the expressway. I wanted to stop and help clean it up, but knew that I would increase the danger by blocking the road with my vehicle and by adding another person to the scene. So I called 911. The response of the dispatcher made it clear that I was adding to the file that was being kept on me.
911 keeps track of every word. 911 asks for identification of the caller, and for the phone number, and many other bits of information that have nothing whatsoever to do with the incident. It makes me cringe even to think of the number of times that I am listed as a person who involves himself in things. Today this is a red flag. In times past such people were counted as good citizens.
The fear of red flags kept on me does not keep me from caring and from becoming involved in helping others. However, it does make me much more leery of the police and others who are keeping track of me.
So it was a delight when this police officer waved to me.
Yet it also left me wondering what this really means.
It is saddening to me to realize that our nation and society have become such that even an act of kindness or a show of friendliness, especially from someone working for the government, has come to be cause for suspicion. It makes me sad to know that my perspective has been thus affected. It makes me even more sad to acknowledge that such a change in perspective is largely justified.
Nevertheless, it is still a joy to report this instance of what at least I perceived as a kindly show of friendliness from one whom I have become conditioned not to expect to demonstrate such. It was a joy to see this police officer wave to me.
And yes, I did wave in return. I did so sheepishly and leerily, but also with a glimmer of hope.
+++
Friday, December 13, 2013
Another Look - Hideous City Council Farce
While it seems unlikely that the Councilwoman meant for this statement to reveal the actual mentality of the Council, sometimes things just come out from the heart without restraint.
Perhaps repeating the snippet five times was overdoing it a bit. However, it does demonstrate how annoying and disheartening it is to hear this from them ad nauseam. We hear this in their speeches, in their actions, and in the bills and taxes.
. . .
Another Hideous City Council Farce
In our latest bill from the City of Wichita for our water usage is this flyer: H2O-flyer-PDF
Front view:
Back view:
Here is the City of Wichita video presenting the deep compassion of this new program:
At 1:28 in this video the presenter says:
It is so important to me, especially after the last water bill raise.
In the opening portion of the video she says:
This month, the City of Wichita City Council approved a new program, known as the Help2Others, H2O, Care Fund. It provides a way for people to make donations, so that others in our community can keep their water on. As you know, this has been an ongoing problem for the last year or two.
Over the last few years I have called to complain about the outrageous increases. With each increase was another excuse.
The last time that I called can you guess the answer that I was given?
I was told that the City is punishing us for using water.
This is UN Agenda 21 being implemented without actually acknowledging it.
Yes, this has been an ongoing problem. With one of the rate hikes we were told that it was because we had not used enough water.
Yes, the City claimed that it could not meet the Water Department’s budget because people had conserved too efficiently. So the City raised the rates to steal more money from us. If less water is used, so also less cost is demanded of the corporation called “The City of Wichita.” But they are seeking to make money, not merely to meet budgets.
Now they are spending money on a program and its propaganda, to urge citizens to give compassionately for the poor people whom the City Council has broken financially.
Surely we should be deeply moved by the compassionate approval of this program.
What fools we are. We have allowed them to raise our rates endlessly, with truly asinine excuses that change with the wind.
What has happened to all of the increased revenue? Where has it gone? Why do the City Council members not simply use these excess funds to help those whom they have broken?
Why do the people of Wichita continue to allow such frauds to hold office and to abuse the populace?
. . .
Perhaps the more pertinent question is “Why do I continue to imagine that attempting to call people to be aware with the hope of action on their part is a worthwhile venture?”
Twice we voted down the building of an undersized arena in the downtown area. Twice they put it on the ballot and we said “NO!” Then they told us that they were building it anyway and that they would make us pay for it, putting on the ballot two choices as to how we would allow them to steal our money. Our sales tax rate was increased as a result.
They continue such abuses and they continue in office.
They raise our water usage rates because we don’t use enough water. They raise our rates because we use too much water. They raise our rates because the rates are too low. They raise our rates without justification several times. They raise our rates to help pay to pump river water into the aquifer. They raise our rates because they want to raise our rates.
Now they want us to raise our rates voluntarily!
The truly disheartening reality is that people will do it.
Even more disheartening is the realization that people will believe that this money will be used to help others.
How soon after this will the next non-voluntary water rate increase be implemented?
. . .
Wednesday, March 06, 2013
Freedom Banned in Washington
CATO Institute has an article entitled: Freedom Banned in Washington. The article shares that in Washington DC there are limits to what a person is allowed to use on vanity license plates.
FREEDOM is one of the banned words.
Apparently a person can use the method below to test various words to learn whether or not the words are permitted.
(embeded code for tag test deleted due to conflicts with IE)
Try it here.
Indeed, Freedom is not permitted.
I tried a number of others that would surely be more controversial and those particular ones were deemed to be OK. But Freedom is not OK.
Try it yourself.
Among a few others that I tried that turned out to be banned are:
GRACE
DAUGHTR
BELIEVE
NO
YES
MY
JES
JUSTICE
SALVATN
SATAN
UP
BOO
WOW
OMEGA
BUM
NUT
CRAZY
BLUE
EVE
CRIB
GAS
FROG
BUT
DEACON
SERVANT
(but Slave is OK)
CRUD
STAR
MUDDY
QUACK
BLOOD
SWEET
JET
GUN
JOKER
DRUGS
IRISH
SCOTCH
BRITISH
MEXICAN
LAMB
WIN
DORK
SHEEP
Can You Believe THIS?
At the government site for the State of Maryland’s Health Department here is what is posted:
Can you believe this? Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene.
Mental Hygiene?
Is this another term for Brainwashing?
Is this getting scarey yet?
Tuesday, March 05, 2013
Drones Will Become Such a Routine Part of American Life That They Eventually Will Be Used to Find Lost Dogs and Cats
The quote is found at 1:30 and following:
More on this is reported at Drones used to find lost dogs, cats?.
Thursday, February 07, 2013
Who’s Your Daddy?
Wow!
I’m just here to support the president of the United States. The president of the United States is, you know, our boss. But he’s also, you know, the president and the first lady are kind of like the mom and the dad of the country. And when your dad says something, you listen. And when you don’t, it usually bites you in the ass later on. So, I’m here to support the president.
Wow! I wonder whether this was meant as a joke. After all, Mr. Rock is a professional jokester who will say or do anything for a laugh.
Having observed the decline in societal ability to think, however, it seems that he may be serious. For the last hundred years Americans have accepted more and more spoon-fed doctrine from the media, Hollywood, government and so-called education.
This is actually a very easy sell. The most effective deceptions are those that mimic the truth the most closely.
Honour thy father and mother; (which is the first commandment with promise;) That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth. (Ephesians 6:2-3)
From this all authority flows. This is the natural order, ordained by the Lord God from the very beginning. This law, this truth, is written on our hearts and in our consciences. It is taught to us by our generation into this world. It is taught from our conception, gestation, parturition, and rearing. We come into this world by the coming together of our father and mother. We are brought forth into the world entirely dependent upon them for everything. Honoring them is the natural response. In honoring them, we ourselves are blessed. In honoring them we are kept safe by their protection and care and instruction. In honoring them, we are properly fed and clothed and housed. In honoring them, we learn what is good for us. These are undeniable facts, even when the parents are not all that they should be. Even when parents are abusive and evil, many of the blessings that accompany honoring them still manifest themselves.
So it seems that Mr. Rock is actually right. The President is our boss and the president and his wife are like our dad and mom. It is indeed meet, right, and salutary that we honor them.
It is sad that very often the full declaration of the Fourth Commandment is not embraced.
Honour thy father and mother; (which is the first commandment with promise;) That it may be well with thee, and thou mayest live long on the earth.
And, ye fathers, provoke not your children to wrath: but bring them up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord. (Ephesians 6:2-4)
Parents and those in authority are not to forget the one from whom this special honor is entrusted. They are not to act as though this authority were theirs for their own purposes or glory. Parents and those in authority are given this authority from above. They are specially designated servants of their Father, to rule according to His will for the sake of His family.
When parents and those in authority forget this, their actions do indeed provoke the children to wrath. Where the love of God is not acknowledged as the source of all good, parents and rulers become abusive of their power and those under their rule eventually rebel. Neither the abuse of power nor the rebelling is good. Neither is of God and His gracious will.
From the beginning all things were created good. Life was peaceful and harmonious. But the devil tried to raise himself above God and thereby cast away from himself the love of God. Lucifer cut himself off from the good and gracious will of God and led a rebellion in a vain attempt to make himself God. The stupidity of such an attempt is astounding, to think that the creature would seek to overthrow the Creator.
Once the rule of God’s love was lost to Lucifer, he acted according to his self-made image. He acted hatefully and deceitfully, seeking to overthrow and destroy everything that God had created. Adam fell for the temptation, but the Lord came calling him back into the life of grace with the confrontation of his sinful choice and the promise of the Seed of Woman who would crush the hateful head/ruler of the serpent.
With this promise, stated as a condemnation of the serpent and its head, flowed the further promise of restoration of the family order. Woman was promised that despite her usurpation of her husband’s rule that she would be moved toward him again so that he would rule over her and that together they would be God’s instruments of life through the promised Seed. Adam was promised that the ground from which he was made would resist his efforts so that he would be continually called to turn from his own efforts and choices to trust the Lord and His Word.
For those who trusted in the Lord and clung to His Word and promise, no other rule was necessary. It was always the refusal to trust the Lord that led people to appoint rulers for themselves to whom they would be subjected. The chosen people of Israel had only the rule of the Word, taught through their parents, until they chose not to trust the Lord and to demand to be subjected to a king like the other nations had chosen for themselves.
In the Church, however, we see the Lord’s order restored. In the Church there is only the servant/slave of the Word ordained over the families. This slave is called shepherd, or pastor, or elder, or presbyter/over-seer. His rule over the Lord’s household is strictly defined as the pure preaching and administration of the Word and the Sacraments. From this all the families are restored to the life of grace, mercy, and peace in which parents are honored and obeyed and children are brought up in the nurture and admonition of the Lord.
At Pentecost this was manifested with the outpouring of the Holy Spirit and the conversion of at least 3000 souls. The life in which they shared was a beautiful manifestation of God’s gracious rule amongst His saints. And in every place where the Lord rules through His means of grace, this is the result. It is true today just as it was then.
Sadly though, it is a rare occurrence today. As with the people of Israel, those professing to be the Church often do not trust the Lord to rule through His means of grace and so they begin to subject themselves to rulers of their own choice. In every case tyranny is the result. The people turn from the Lord and what He has ordained and bind themselves to various forms of tyranny with such devotion that they endure terrible things as if they were necessary. It is as James warns in James 4 and James 5.
Those who trust in the Lord and walk in His ways do not appoint earthly rulers for themselves. Rather, they subject themselves to the rulers whom the Lord raises up over them. First He gives them parents. Secondly He gives them pastors. He also gives them rulers whom the rebellious have raised up in their rebellion. The saints subject themselves to such rulers for the sake of good order, obeying in all things which do not demand sinful acts on their own part. Wherever the rulers demand what is wrong, the saints peacefully disregard the tyrannical orders and suffer the abuses that result.
And so Mr. Rock is right, regardless of whether or not he knows why. But does this mean that the president should be supported in disobeying the authority under which he is subjected? When he is placed with an oath to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States of America, is he to be supported when he willfully disobeys the authority under which he is placed?
The American people have squandered the power given to them to hold such unlawful rulers in check. They have chosen to squander their votes, voting for the lesser of two evils. They have worshiped their false security of the promise of pensions and Social Security checks and voted according to their idolatry. They have voted for a woman’s right to choose death rather than voting to defend life for all. They have voted to support our soldiers, even when the military was being used for wicked and evil agendas. They have voted with selfish and irresponsible motives and so they have elected selfish and irresponsible and even wicked rulers.
Now they cry out and wonder how this could happen, and worse, many say that they are thankful that the consequences will come after they have departed from this world without genuine care for those who will be left to endure the consequences. What sort of parents and grandparents would speak with such selfish and wicked disregard for their responsibilities? Mr. Rock stood and said that he supports Obama in violating the Constitution. Is this not what the passing generation has done as well? Have they not ignored their responsibilities concerning the younger generations? Those who fear, love, and trust in God above all things do not act in this way. They love their neighbors as themselves. They honor father and mother and they display this honor as loving fathers and mothers. They endure abuse while speaking out for what is right and true and calling for right treatment of their families and neighbors.
Oh that people understood the holiness of the Lord that is taught to us in the Ten Commandments. Then we would not have wars and rumors of wars but we would fall together on our knees confessing our need for remission of our sins and reconciliation to God and one another. No one who bows the knees and head to God as Father and Redeemer and Savior and Justifier and Sanctifier rises up rebelliously to murder and make war. Rather, the peace of God that surpasses all understanding guards their hearts and minds in Christ Jesus forevermore. Where peace rules honor is displayed toward all.
+ + +
Saturday, January 26, 2013
Unlocking Cellphones Becomes Illegal
The article Unlocking Cellphones Becomes Illegal Saturday reports that today, January 26, 2013, the government has declared that it is illegal to unlock a new cell phone.

Myself, I did not even consider the issue as this seems to me to be clearly stated in the contract that people sign with the big mobile carriers.
However, it is amazing that the government will prosecute people for breaking private contracts, using Copyrights as the excuse. Big corporations that are overcharging people for phones and for mobile services now have the US Government to enforce their contracts.
Sadly it is no longer ironic that the US Government does not take interest in prosecuting the big corporations for violating the contracts with their customers. The US Government has absolutely no concern for the fact that these corporations promise good service but do not supply good service. The government takes no action regarding the abuses of these corporations with poor reception, dropped calls, bad connections, and a host of other issues.
Instead, the government helps the corporations to enforce the contract in a one-sided action against the little people. Suing these companies is restricted to class action law suites because of the cost factors. These suits are a joke as they never actually punish the corporate thieves and most customers never even see any substantial refunds.
Moreover, the corporations are allowed to track the customers’ activities without restriction and without customer consent. “Minority Report” type selling of the customers’ activities and even location is now common. People are even being conned into accepting retinal scanning “for their protection.”
In the end, it is the willful gullibility of the customers that allows this. Greed, a.k.a. “envy” and “idolatry,” lusting after every new technological gimmickry. If people did not buy the overpriced phones and plans, and if they demanded proper service or stopped using the phones, and if they voted for officials who actually cared about people rather than enslaving them through economics and promotion of lust, things would be different.
But that requires an otherworldly mindset.
Philippians 3:20
Colossians 3
+ + +
Sunday, December 16, 2012
Do We Really Need Moore Control?
Do we really need Moore control in our lives and over our citizenship? Do we really need more governmental control over our freedoms?

It is reported at Michael Moore Takes To Twitter To Demand Stricter Gun Control that Michael Moore (and a number of other Twitters) has made a number of twit remarks concerning the recent Newtown tragedy and the need for Moore gun control laws to counteract the Constitution. He does not believe that the American people should be allowed to govern themselves concerning their ownership of private property, particularly not private ownership of guns.
The Inquisitr report reads:
Michael Moore has taken to Twitter to call for tighter gun controls after a shooter killed 27 people – including 20 children – at a Newtown grade school.
The Bowling for Columbine director tweeted:
“Too soon to speak out about a gun-crazy nation? No, too late. At least THIRTY-ONE school shootings since Columbine.”
He later added:
“The way to honor these dead children is to demand strict gun control, free mental health care, and an end to violence as public policy.”
Other reported Twitters said:
Gun control is our only road to freedom. Freedom from the fear of senselessly losing children. I'm so saddened. WE NEED LAWS NOW.- - -
Gun control is no longer debatable- it's not a 'conversation'- It's a moral mandate. '
I really do not know quite what to think of Michael Moore and other Twitters like him.
Could it be that they really are genuinely concerned citizens with good intentions who simply do not think through to the conclusions of their presumptions and demands? Could it be that they are not really seeking to undermine the Constitution and the rights of American citizens but are simply very simple-minded people who have never learned to think logically and realistically? Is it possible that they really are so irrational as to believe that making public policies actually effects any kind of change and solves problems?
Perhaps.
For the sake of learning and thinking, let’s consider this from that perspective.
In what areas do people who think this way acknowledge and even demand that privacy be respected and the respective actions of individuals be treated as rights? What are some of these areas?
- Irresponsible/Casual Sex
- Abortion
- Alternative Sex & Lifestyles
- AIDS/HIV & other STDs
- Pornography
- Welfare & Foodstamps
What are some of the areas where people who think this way reject a right to privacy and a right to act according to their own decisions?
- Gun Ownership
- Home Schooling
- Open Practice of Christian Faith
- Banking
- Health Care & Insurance
- Income and Business
- Property Ownership & Use
Amazingly, people of this mindset praise Islam as a religion of peace while condemning preaching of the Gospel as HATE SPEECH.
How is it that with a topic like gun ownership and use, people of this mindset call for more governmental control of the guns that are not misused but often defend those who misuse guns?
Why do they defend murderers, seeking to prevent them from facing the death penalty, even though these abusers enacted the death penalty against others?
Why do they want to give more control of guns to the government, the same government that still has not answered for “Fast and Furious”? How many people have died from the guns that this controlling government secretly and illegally supplied to known criminals and abusers of guns? Is this not the same controlling government that is giving guns to known Jihadists and al-Qaeda terrorist groups? Where is the logic in entrusting control of the guns to this irresponsible (or worse) government, and to take control away from law abiding citizens who have proven their responsible ownership and use of guns?
How is it that someone like Michael Moore can say, “The way to honor these dead children is to demand strict gun control, free mental health care, and an end to violence as public policy,” while saying not one word regarding the 137 children who are killed every hour in America through abortion?
Here are the statistics as reported at Abortion Statistics:
- 234 abortions per 1,000 live births (according to the Centers for Disease Control)
- Abortions per year: 1.2 million
- Abortions per day: 3,288
- Abortions per hour: 137
- 9 abortions every 4 minutes
- 1 abortion every 26 seconds
20 children are murdered by a person in a random occurrence and the Moore-like reactionists begin to call for taking guns away from people regardless of how responsible these gun owners have proven themselves to be.
Yet with a child being murdered ever 26 seconds in America these same Mooreites do not even consider demanding that abortion clinics and Planned Parenthood be held accountable and have their licences revoked.
1.2 MILLION children are wiped out in an ongoing bloody massacre EVERY year! Three thousand two hundred eighty-eight every DAY!
Where is the outcry?
IS
the
OUTCRY?
Where is the demand for the government to control or to stop this?
How is it that the things that they defend are harming the people and the children of our country and that the things that they attack are often the very things that benefit the people and the country?
I myself am not a great lover of guns. I’m not even a strong proponent of self-defense. Yet I certainly am able to understand why our Constitution was written with the right for these built into the Bill of Rights.
How is it that those who react to an incident like the Newtown tragedy never seem to report or respond to the cases where law abiding and gun carrying citizens have saved the lives of themselves or their families or even others from the attacks of people with nefarious motives? Why is it that the media rarely if ever report such amazing and heroic stories?
Why is a teacher who is shot and killed trying to herd the children into a closet while 20 children are left undefended is counted as a hero, but a teacher who desires to carry a legal handgun so as to be able actually to defend the children and prevent most of them from being harmed is counted as an monster to be controlled?
If that dear teacher who herded the children into a closet had a handgun perhaps she could have shot the perpetrator and minimized the number of children who died.
Would that not be equally heroic and perhaps even better than 20 dead children plus 6 dead adults? Or what if the principal and other administrators were so prepared and properly trained in the use of arms? What if instead of calling for the government to rob citizens of their right to bear arms if the call was for proper instruction in the ownership and use of guns to protect neighbors and children?
The writers of the Constitution deliberated these matters very carefully. They themselves fought for the rights and safety of others. Michael Moore and most Twitters are not known for investment in careful study of matters and then reporting the wisdom from it. They do seem to spend a lot of time with Twits and Tweets and their flashes of brilliant logic. Surely such 140 character comments outshine the laborious endeavors of those who drafted the Constitution.
How many times have such people come to the aid and defense of their neighbors? With what means would they defend anyone?
Ah, of course! They would whip out their cell phones and begin texting!
By the way, has anyone given thought to the number of people killed or injured because of some Twitter texting as compared to the number of people hurt by those who legally owned guns?
Furthermore, which has caused more harm and damage to America’s citizenry:
or
Bush’s bailout and Obama’s stimulus?
Pushing yet further, which has caused the death and injury of more women:
or
abortions?
Shall we push it farther?
Which has caused more harm and deaths for American people:
or
Pharmaceuticals?
The logic employed by those who are calling for gun control, which really means gun ownership restriction, is not consistent with reality. It is a reactionary response at best.
Calling for more government mandated mental heath control is even more illogical and even dangerous. If one considers the increase in erratic behavior of the dangerous kind that has occurred as more psychological and psychiatric and mental health measures have been implemented, there is no reason to believe that these are actually bringing improvements to the mental health of the populace nor that they are reducing incidences of violence. To the contrary, the evidence indicates the exact opposite to be true.
So what then is the answer? What do we need?
We need for a change in focus among the citizenry. We need for the people to remember that they are responsible for their own lives and actions. We need for the people to turn from dependence upon government and the many other fallible sources of security so that they again look to the things that make for true security and peace and hope and blessedness.
Moore and his ilk are not really so far off from the rest of us. We all tend to look to exert control in our lives and especially over the things that we find troublesome, unacceptable, and unpleasant. We seek control for ourselves. But we especially seek control of others.
Sadly, the more that we seek to have control, either by our own authority and power or through government or other authority, we actually make matters even worse.
A powerful example of this is the horrible atrocities committed by those who proclaimed themselves to be Christian authoritarians. Those who presumed to be God’s controllers committed some of the most horrific crimes against humanity. This is because they sought to be in control rather than to submit to that which effects the true beneficial control.
There is only one source that provides the control that benefits all alike. That is the peace of God in Christ Jesus. The peace that God’s love works among us is the only control that brings true unity and harmony. When the love of God in Christ is what holds us and keeps us and guards us, then we love even as we are loved. Then we look to neighbor with the same love that we have for ourselves. Then we do not seek to control neighbor, but to serve neighbor. And neighbor, also motivated by this same love of God, seeks to serve us.
More guns are not the answer. Neither is more governmental control of guns or of anything else the answer. The more that we empower the government to control, the more that the problems are increased.
The evidence for this is not hard to find. Consider the mistreatment of the American Indians, the importation of human slaves from Africa and other parts of the world, the mistreatment of Chinese immigrants, the Japanese internment, the prejudicial treatment of various races toward one another, the perpetual banking and monetary abuses. We have suffered the proliferation of wars both here and throughout the world. Do we, the average citizens, even know how many conflicts our military personnel are involved in throughout the world right now? Where does the list of abuses of power by the government’s elite end? The more power entrusted to these leaders, the more power that they exert. The more power that they exert, the more that abuses will occur.
Michael Moore and those like him seem to imagine that those who abide by the law should be restricted and even punished in order to gain control. This is because they do not believe that people can live peaceably together without this kind of coercive control. The more that this is considered, the more absurd it seems that in order to protect the people from guns, they seek to employ guns to reduce guns. And so the abuses against the innocent are multiplied.
However, when we, the people, act with the responsibility of our own vocations (callings), acting with loving response to the needs of those around us, these abuses diminish. When we look not to those who rule with regulations and laws and force and taxes and fines and imprisonment, but turn from them to the One who rules through gracious care, forgiveness, love, and peace, then we see a lifestyle develop among us that flows freely and without coercive control. In fact, it does not develop so much as it is nurtured and generated. And the more that it is nurtured and generated among us the more that we desire it.
This is the way of God’s Holy Communion. This is His good and gracious will. This Advent season is the perfect time to stand back and reflect and see what God proclaims as His salvific will and plan. Then, we are well prepared to approach with open hearts and minds to behold it in the Christ Mass.
If only Michael Moore and the world would stop busying themselves with twittering and facebooking and texting and seeking to control everyone, and allow themselves to see and hear what God gives us in the birth of the babe born in Bethlehem.
As for me and my house, this is where our hearts find peace and security. Neither guns nor the control of guns can grant this. Mental health mandates cannot accomplish this. Declarations of public policy cannot bring this to fruition. Nevertheless, the Lord does grant it freely and without end through the means that He has ordained.
It is truly amazing to remember that His plan is brought to us through a gentle virgin who delivered the Savior into the world in austerity. The ultimate victory was accomplished through His self-sacrifice, yielding Himself into the hands of wicked men. His reign is not by force but through the comforting promises of the Gospel, through which peace guards the hearts of those who receive it. Those who abide in His kingdom gladly and willingly subject themselves to this way of peace, moved by the faith and love that His love generates in their hearts.
In the Christ Mass the Gloria in Excelsis that has been omitted during Advent shall return and the saints shall sing joyously with the angels and all the hosts of heaven:
Glory be to God on high, and on earth peace, good will toward men!
May Michael and his friends come to know this glorious and joyous good news in their lives, too.
+ + +
Sunday, October 28, 2012
Uncle Sam: “I Want YOU!”
As I was reading various news articles and contemplating the recent laws and executive orders that have been enacted, this image came to my mind:
On one US postal stamp it was reduced to this:

This truly does seem to portray what the powerful elite have transformed the American government to be and do and seek.
I find my self wondering how I ever was duped into believing that the government was about serving the people. How many generations have accepted this stern and even vicious image and its slogan as a portrayal of the United States and her government?
It is really quite frightening to realize what it actually says. It is perhaps even more frightening to realize that by and large we all have accepted this.
Saturday, October 20, 2012
FedGov Says There is Too Much Fluoride in Water
For a very brief time earlier this year the mainstream media actually reported this matter as in this video clip:
Of course, the full truth is not disclosed, and in fact a lie is embedded in what the Feds say. In this video it is said: “The government says there’s no evidence fluoride causes serious illness. The only concern for now is the potentially serious damage to children’s teeth.”
As anyone can read on ANY toothpaste carton, this is an outright lie.
Even in what is reported in this video, this is shown to be false. First it is shared that it is causing serious bone damage and then it is said that there’s no evidence of causing serious illness. And this is just the tip of the iceberg.
If one performs an Internet search for “fed gov says too much fluoride” Google shows “About 559,000 results”. These results show that the mainstream coverage of this issue was very short lived.
Among the top results are:
FedGov Says There is Too Much Fluoride in Water - Fluorosis A Serious Problem
Too much fluoride in water, government says At MSNBC
U.S. says too much fluoride in water at USA Today
Officials Say Kids Getting Too Much Fluoride at NPR
Government says too much fluoride in water
The toxicity of fluoride and fluorine is well known. It is a scientific fact.
The EPA has regulations controlling disposal of this toxic waste byproduct of industry.
Yet there exist proponents of putting this toxin in our drinking water and these propagandists are spending large amounts of money to convince the public that this is acceptable.
Fluoride is NOT an essential nutrient. It is not required in our bodily functions. This is well documented at:
Fluoride Is Not an Essential Nutrient.
According to the City of Wichita’s Frequently Asked Questions
The City's drinking water contains approximately 0.3mg/L (PPM) of naturally occurring fluoride.
From the MSNBC article linked to above:
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services is announcing a proposal to change the recommended fluoride level to 0.7 milligrams per liter of water. And the Environmental Protection Agency will review whether the maximum cutoff of 4 milligrams per liter is too high.
The standard since 1962 has been a range of 0.7 to 1.2 milligrams per liter.
So why is there a push for more fluoride in Wichita’s drinking water? Wichita’s water already has .3mg/L of naturally occurring fluoride. The new and improved federal level is a reduction to only .7mg/L of this poison.
Rather than adding this toxic substance to our drinking water we should be demanding that it be filtered from it.
Sadly, many families cannot afford to install effective filtration for their homes and so they and their children are being bombarded with this terrible toxin already. So the proposed action is to add more of this poison to the water.
The EPA regulates how much fluoride a company is allowed to have in its effluent. Additionally, sewage treatment plants are regulated concerning the levels of fluoride released into rivers.
Yet we are told that adding this substance to our drinking water is safe.
In our home we installed a reverse osmosis filtering system for our drinking water needs. But what of the many families who do not know to do this or cannot afford to do this? A reasonably priced one can be purchased and installed with minimal knowledge of plumbing, yet when families are struggling to afford even basic necessities, what then?
It is a very sad matter when those who have been entrusted with our protection are the very ones who are poisoning us.
Thursday, October 18, 2012
How Is a Blind Man’s Cane Mistaken for a Samurai Sword?
Who in his right mind would think that this white cane was a samurai sword and the man carrying it a dangerous threat?

Apparently police worldwide think so.
The following reports tell the story:
Terror of blind man tasered by police: 'I thought they'd kill me', says stroke victim aged 61 whose white stick was mistaken for a samurai sword
Blind man tasered in police blunder
Police use Taser on blind man after stick mistaken for sword
More and more this sort of “mistake” is occurring worldwide. How can such things be happening? How is it that this is becoming more and more common?
It is happening according to the plan.
People are being trained to see terrorists everywhere. Police are being trained to suspect everyone. Police and military personnel are trained to look for this.
At the airport and at city hall, ordinary citizens are treated as potential perpetrators of violence. A fingernail clipper is treated as a weapon and a bottle of water is counted as a possible bomb making ingredient.
People are being trained and encouraged to report “peculiar” behavior of their neighbors.
Is it really surprising that this is causing hysteria of the kind that leads to overreaction and use of force against a blind man carrying a cane for assistance?
People need to wake up and realize that this is bad news. We need to stop this before it is too late.
Certainly there exist proper causes for suspicion. But these are obvious in their peculiarity. A stranger lurking around the back window or back door of a neighbor’s house, is a good example. Someone wearing a ski mask in August is a very suspicious action.
But unless you believe that Highlander is a true to life story, reporting a man walking down the street with a samurai sword is insanity. For the police to react to such reports without extreme discretion is absolute insanity. When the suspected man is an elderly man walking slowly and with care, not threatening anyone, there is no excuse for such behavior.
But this hysteria is growing. It is being promoted by the government bureaucracies, by the media, and by the government schools. It is actually being taught and fostered.
Police and military personnel should not be such fools as this. They are thinking people. But they are taught to obey orders above all else. They are actually taught to be abusive, as with this elderly blind man, to apply assertive and abusive force and to make the handcuffs tight enough to hurt. They are taught not to hesitate. They are taught that protecting themselves against a suspected aggressor is more important than being certain.
Family and friends need to confront their loved ones who serve as law enforcement and military, lovingly reminding them of their vows to protect and serve. If they do not count right as more important than might, they should resign. If the lives of those they are sworn to protect are not more important than risking their own, then they should resign.
The country is safer without them if they have the wrong mindset. At least most criminals cannot call for hundreds for backup.
And what of the notion that collateral damage is acceptable in a faux war against terror? What is the proportion of people killed in the war against terror to the number killed by so-called terrorist attacks? How many thousands and tens of thousands have been killed directly in the so-called war against terror? And if the extensive collateral damage of poisoned water and effects are counted, how many more tens of thousands?
Which is more terrifying, really? Which is the greater atrocity?
Then there are the massive changes that have been forced upon the citizens of the nations fighting this war on terror. I can still remember when one could escort loved ones all the way to the embarking gate without even showing ID. I can remember when people were not afraid of the police and security people at airports and elsewhere. I can remember when police smiled and waved back when we waved to them. I remember when we were not afraid to wave to the police as they passed by.
I also remember when we were not afraid of what our neighbors would report concerning our actions. I remember when a spanking was not counted as abuse of one’s naughty child. And yes, I am thankful that my parents were free to use such measures when they believed them to be necessary.
Today parents are arrested and their children are taken away if the parents dare to discipline them strongly. Yet the TSA regularly frightens children and even gropes them publically, taking their toys and their drinks from them. The police assist bankers in driving families from their homes. The military confiscates guns from homeowners in the aftermath of horrific natural disasters.
These things became more prevalent during all of the presidents and their administrations and congresses of the past fifty years. Isn’t it time that we wake up and stop putting these goons in office? Isn’t time that we act responsibly?
Isn’t it time that we acknowledge the fact that voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil? If everyone abandoned this insane notion and voted their conscience instead, the world would truly become a safer and more peaceful place to live.
If people truly acted responsibly and only voted according to their consciences, voting only for those whom they perceived as clearly and truly godly and faithful and honest, imagine how much smaller government would be and how much less money would be required to run it?
Well, it is a very nice dream.
Monday, May 14, 2012
Government versus Small Business Income
From Top 30 Most Profitable Small Businesses During 2008, here is a table of the reported profit margins:

This is a listing of the profit margins for the TOP 30 most profitable. The margins of profit range from 7.65% to 16.92%. This is for companies that actually produce something for the moneys received.
At Kansas Dept. of Revenue Publication 1700: All city, county and special jurisdiction sales tax rates is the official listing of sales taxes for the various cities in the state of Kansas.
For Wichita the sales tax rate is 6.3% for the State + 1.0 for the city for a total profit margin of 7.3%. And for this the government’s only production is legislation requiring that the people pay this fee/tax for what others have produced.
In addition to sales taxes are the road taxes on gasoline sales, property taxes on real property and equipment, licencing fees, registration fees, 911 fees, and the list goes on and on.
But even at 7.3%, this matches or at least approaches the entire profit margin for many small businesses.
If businesses can operate and even grow with this rate, why can the government not do so? If this is the income level of successful business investors, the income level with which they buy homes and provide for their families and purchase cars and pay taxes and purchase insurance and prepare for retirement, why is this not enough for the government? Why is there never an end to the talk of increasing taxes?
Do you know the answer?
There is a saying: “Follow the money.” Indeed, if one follows the money one will answer the question as to why the government never has enough.
The answer is very disturbing, even angering.
- - -
Sunday, May 13, 2012
Is this "Cool" ... "No need to panic"?
Officials conduct military training in So. Fla.
One tourist calls it “cool.”
Reported in segment 1:48 of the video: “Some people even called 911,” and the police officer kindly explains, “A lot of people have called in a panic, there’s no need to panic.”
When I was young the popular TV show SWAT was considered to be cool. I thought so, too. I never really thought about the implications of police being trained and programed to act as assassins in body armor. I never really moved beyond the presentation of these special weapons and tactics as noble protectors of the populace. I never really thought it through to the point of considering that police were being specially trained to kill Americans by the order of their superiors.
Is this cool? Or should the people be concerned?
Under the guise of fighting terrorism, this special training is being expanded beyond anything that any common citizen would ever have imagined even a few years ago. Military and local police are now being trained together to “fight terrorism” and “civil uprising.”
The NDAA gives these enforcers of “peace” the authority to act openly in ways that have never been done openly. Citizens can now be arrested and detained indefinitely without legal representation (and worse).
The kindly police officer informs us: “A lot of people have called in a panic, there’s no need to panic.”
Are we being taught not to have concern over such maneuvers? Are we being programmed simply to accept such things as common place events in our society? Are we being set up for this sort of thing being done in our cities as what is to be expected?
At what point do the citizens have cause for being concerned? At what point do we as Christians have cause to be concerned for our neighbors and countrymen? When does love for neighbor move us to stand up and cry: “Whoa! What is this?”
Have we ever seen any cause to question the leaders of this country and the world? How many times did the American Indians trust the government to honor the treaties that were signed only to be abused yet again? How many KKK members were in government and law enforcement, with no protection for those who were abused and even killed? What of those who were imprisoned in the concentration/detainment camps for the people of Japanese ancestry? What of those who have had their businesses and homes raided by the IRS enforcers? What about the arrest of gentle and honest farmers selling raw milk to people who desire it? How about what was recently done to Mr. Del Rio as reported at Austin Steals Elderly Veteran’s House for Crime of Having Fallout Shelter. According to the report:
The city began its theft by sending the code enforcement team to Mr. Del Rio’s home early one Saturday morning in May of 2010. After the retired Air Force reservist, Vietnam veteran, and former state employee put on some clothes and opened the door, he was rushed by an Austin Police SWAT team. He was detained and interrogated over a period of ten hours.
Here stands the man:

The city sent a SWAT team. In what way is this justifiable or even rational? When we hear of these things being done to our neighbors and fellow countrymen, should we not become alarmed? These things are happening all over the country. These are happening with the approval of both the Democrats and the Republicans. When the police are the ones being used in this way, to whom can a citizen turn for help? When the judges do nothing and the media presents these as “cool” and stupid citizens accept these things as “cool,” or say, “What can I do about it?” the situation grows in intensity. Isn’t it time to say “No more!”?
For a closer view of what is coming, see U.S. Army Re-Education Manual: Yet More Chilling Revelations.
From above, if a SWAT team was sent to intimidate and arrest Mr. Del Rio, a retired citizen who has served his country in many capacities, for whom are these detention camps being built? Whom are the government leaders labeling as people who should be detained and/or reeducated?
Last year in my post Where have all the police gone? , I shared a late night event where over 40 police cars and a helicopter converged upon a local bowling ally on account of an off-duty police officer working security who encountered two unruly men.
Are such things not indicative of matters becoming out of control, or at least, not being focused primarily upon protection of the people?
I find these things very concerning. I hear of people going hungry, unable to afford medical care, losing their homes, being mugged because they cannot afford to drive and have to walk home late at night from their jobs.
I am concerned because the most precious treasure of mankind, the pure Gospel, is being misrepresented so that people are becoming hardened to it and to belief in the God of the Gospel. Ultimately, this is my greatest concern, as the church bodies become more and more corrupt, and the government and society follow. The healing and peace and joy and comfort of the Gospel is being buried or transformed so that people are not receiving these blessings and benefits, and both society and the country are moving in a direction toward destruction.
How sad.
- - -
Monday, April 23, 2012
Another Two Local Small Businesses Bite the Dust
Two of the local family owned trash haulers in Wichita have been gobbled up.
In February Lies was consumed by Waste Management, an enormous company based in Texas.
Lies Trash Service sells to Waste Management
Waste Management buys Lies Trash Service
This past month Sanitation Services, LLC sent flyers to the customers of Haggard Trash Service, informing us that they purchased Haggard. For now, at least it is still a locally owned company. Nevertheless, the flyer indicates higher prices.
Small businesses are disappearing more and more rapidly as the government at every level increases the regulations and taxes (often disguised as fees). But the enormity of the new rules being imposed is oppressive — stupid, pointless rules that have as the ultimate objective the obliteration of private and independent enterprise. The small businesses, which provide the more personal and comprehensive services, cannot bear the burden of the big impersonal corporations who receive many incentives from both local and federal government as well as charging higher prices while paying less taxes.
Such has become the way of America and the world.
The United Nations Agenda 21 is being imposed with daily greater aggression. With the addition of the National Defense Resources Preparedness Order signed by the Obama on March 16, the potential for presidential usurpation of all resources has been made official. Some are trying to minimize what this means, but the handwriting is on the wall.
- - -
UN Agenda 21
Obama's Executive Order Authorizes Peacetime Martial Law
- - -
Friday, April 20, 2012
Privacy?
A few minutes ago I called VIPRE support (my firewall and anti-virus security company) regarding the plethora of fraudulent e-mails that I receive daily. Today one claimed that a payment to the federal government failed. Another used the AT&T payment cover page.
The Vipre representative was friendly, kindly, and helpful, as always and assured me that this is a phishing issue and not an infection issue, but to continue being cautious not to click on anything nor to give any information in response to these e-mails and never, ever to open an attachment from them.
A few minutes after speaking with this very nice gentleman I received a support ticket e-mail from Vipre. I was startled on account of the fact that I did not give my name, phone number, e-mail address, nor any other personal information during the phone conversation. Apparently the Vipre phone support system has a direct link to their computer, which reads the caller ID and extrapolates all other information held in their database and generates a support ticket e-mail.
While on the one hand I am impressed that Vipre is so thorough as to send a support ticket, it also leaves me feeling terribly disconcerted that such information compiling is occurring.
This shows how much data is being gathered by big companies regarding each of us. It shows how even a simple phone call is being tracked and linked to other information concerning each of us, not only by companies with whom we do business, but by others, including the federal government.
Even more alarming is the awareness that this is only the tip of the iceberg.
- - -
Thursday, April 05, 2012
Reaction to Government Imposed Religion
Yes, Evolution and Psychology are part of the government’s religion, and it is being forcibly imposed upon the populace. This young lady cried out violently against what continually bombards her, but she does not fully understand.
Some of the people who commented on this article made comments about how this young lady is a racist and a product of welfare, etc. One lady spoke against the other students who displayed the laughter of dismay, as if they were without compassion, when they were actually victims who laughed rather than to respond in other ways.
This type of incident is becoming more and more common in our society. It will become even more prevalent in the future.
Why? Why is this happening? Why are we seeing people suddenly go berserk and act out violently? Why are there people suddenly “Going Postal”?
In this young lady’s case, did she perhaps know of the racial eugenics of Evolutionism? Did she know that the early promotion of Evolutionism was to dehumanize certain groups of people? Did she know that in America the religion of evolution was propagated to “prove” the inferiority of the African peoples?
It is hard to say. Perhaps she simply listened to too many racial hatemongers like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton and the Obama. There is no question that many people have been victims of such propaganda, being continually taught that reacting with anger and outrage is the proper and perhaps only response to various observable inequities.
Mix in perhaps a few psychiatric drugs prescribed to manipulate her emotions rather than to deal with them, consider also whatever family dysfunction she may daily encounter, add also the collapsing economy and the personal and community impact, pile on the growing threat of the governmental denial of Constitutional protections (through the NDAA, TSA, NSA, CIA, etc.), finally add in the forced continual exposure to the denigrating and intellectually insulting false doctrine of Evolutionism, and eventually all of this pent up confusion breaks through to those around her.
Outbursts like this young lady’s are not without cause. While these causes may not justify or excuse her actions, they do help to put things into a more understandable perspective, and perhaps also lead to a certain degree of sympathy and empathy. Maybe we should actually invest the energy to listen and hear such people.
After all, we are such people.
+ + +
Monday, March 19, 2012
Real Costs of Inflation
2000 - - 3.4%
2001 - - 2.8%
2002 - - 1.6%
2003 - - 2.3%
2004 - - 2.7%
2005 - - 3.4%
2006 - - 3.2%
2007 - - 2.9%
2008 - - 3.8%
2009 - - -0.4%
2010 - - 1.6%
2011 - - 3.2%
2012 - - 3.3%
Is there anyone in the world who actually believes these reported rates of inflation? Is there anyone who actually purchases daily need items, such as groceries, who believes that these figures even come close to representing the increases in costs that have been imposed upon us?
Some months the costs have increased by these percentages in those singular months!
What is more is that for many items not only had the cost risen for the item, but the size of the item has been reduced as well.
The article that drew my attention to this chart is How the Fed Steals for the 1%.
This article makes its point without even having to challenge the falsified data. Even using the misrepresentative figures that the FED bankers publish, the theft of our wealth is demonstrated in shocking measure. If the real inflation rates were used, it would be even more shocking.
This article effectively demonstrates how much better off Americans were when the Constitution still was the law of the land and Congress controlled our money supply. After the international bankers were given control of the money supply through allowing them to create the separate banking entity of the Federal Reserve, Income Taxes were instituted to take our incomes from us to give to these bankers for the privilege of using our own money. Now we have to pay them for the privilege of having a monetary system. The founding fathers provided a monetary system that would cost us nothing. Why do Americans fail to see that this is a far better and prosperous way? Why do Americans fail to see that we should first replace the politicians who enslave us to the FED, and then, replace the FED with our own monetary supply again?
The issue before us seems to be the lack of understanding that people have regarding what the FED really is. This is on account of the Federally controlled indoctrination system, mislabeled as “public education.”
Here is an oversimplification of what the FED is. While it is an oversimplification, it still makes the point of which most people are unaware.
Let’s say I come to you when you are paying your bills and I draw your attention to the fact that you have a fluctuation in the amount of money in your wallet or checking account as you pay your bills. Then I offer to help you stabilize your money supply by changing the method by which you receive your money. Then I take all of your money from your wallet and your checking and savings accounts and from your pensions and other assets. In place of your money, I offer you a new money supply, one that has my name on it and which I control. I then will control the amount of this money that is available to you. Before you can use this money, you must purchase this money from me. (This is how I take your money in the first place.)
You purchase my money from me for an additional fee, called interest. Then you must pay me this interest for as long as this money is in circulation. Naturally, because the interest continues to accumulate, more money must be purchased to put into circulation. This money naturally has interest which you and your children and all future generations will pay to me. I do not pay anything for the money that I sell to you at interest.
When you need more money to pay me more interest, I will simply invent more monetary units to sell to you. I will not do any work to obtain these monetary units. I will not pay anything for them. I will not supply any collateral for backing of the value. It is actually your future income that I use for backing the value of my money. Therefore, you must work and earn money in order for my money to have value. Moreover, in order for you to earn this money, you must first borrow it from me. I get away with this because you have established my money as the legal currency that you are legally required to accept and use.
Moreover, any costs that I incur for printing and accounting I will charge to you. Which of course will mean that you will have to buy more monetary units from me. Moreover, every time that I make more monetary units available to you, the value of the monetary units that you now have will become devalued so that more are needed to make the same purchases of regular goods. Thus even more money will be needed. This is called inflation, which is guaranteed to be incurred perpetually.
So that future generations will not realize that I am an entity entirely separate from you and family (nation/government), I will use a name that sounds like your family (nation/government). I will call myself the Federal Reserve which sounds like I am actually of your family and that I actually have reserves of value that guarantee value for my money that you purchase from me. Of course I have no reserves other than your enslavement to the use of my money and I certainly am not of your family. But that is the beauty of using this name for myself. It tricks you into unwavering fidelity and loyalty to me, and saves me from having to care about you in any way whatsoever. I can use this name and this system to make you work and invest to make me unimaginably wealthy and powerful.
While the actual deceptive ploys are somewhat more intricate than this, this really is what the Federal Reserve and every other central bank in the world is and does.
Then these bankers also fabricate data to tell us that the rate of inflation and suffering is not nearly what our own senses and reason indicate.
It saddens me and even angers me that my fellow Americans close their eyes and minds to what is happening so that they continue to support these bankers who promote going to war with other nations under the guise of protecting America’s interests. How is it that my fellow Americans are unwilling to see that it is not interests but interest that is being protected and propagated. Every one of these invasions gives these bankers control of yet another nation’s economy. Every one of these invasions is paid for by our government, which means increased money supply, which means increased interest for the FED bankers. Trillions upon TRILLIONS of dollars are being added to the debt, debt that is held by the FED bankers. So we pay them to make war on other nations, nations upon whom they impose their monetary control. We go bankrupt to help enslave people who are already poor and struggling for survival.
Worst of all, the Obama, Gingrich, Romney, and Santorum all support this as “god-fearing” representatives. And the people follow and chant, “God bless America! God bless our troops!”
Then they go to the supermarket and attack and abuse and curse the poor grocery clerk for “ripping them off.”
I still cringe when I remember Michelle Obama’s statement that for the first time she was proud of her country. But now I am beginning to understand that what this means is that now her husband is one of the elite who actually own us as a country. Is that perhaps what she means by “Her Country”? She certainly seems to enjoy her vacation trips to Hawaii that we give her.
Argh!
Wake up, America!
Argh! Argh! Argh!
- - -
You know, it is really sad because I cannot turn off my love for this country and her people and all who could benefit from who we are, or at least once were and could be again. Certainly this nation has never been a perfect nation, nor even truly righteous. Yet we have been blessed beyond any fathomable accounting. We have enjoyed freedom and prosperity. We have also enjoyed the benefit of our marvelous Constitution and Bill of Rights. So far, these still exist.
As I consider these, and especially the freedom that we have enjoyed in proclaiming the Gospel, I still rejoice and give thanks. I still want to cry out to my countrymen and even to the world with thanks to God for what we have enjoyed, what we still enjoy, and what could be preserved for future generations. I am even willing to make sacrifices toward this end, but what sacrifices are really even needed? Is it really a sacrifice to be willing to vote for someone who actually represents these things that provide such enormous blessings?
What an oddball, hey?
+ + +
Attack Dogs used on a High School Walkout in MD
Dogs used on a HS Students. Four Arrested For “Thought Crimes"
From what I’ve been reading elsewhere, the nutrition is indeed a cause of concern, especially with the “pink slime” and other toxic additives that are being used in government school lunches.
While I don’t know enough about the various issues of concern to these high school students to attempt to address these issues, the fact that the government has this much control over the populace horrifies me. I never realized the extent to which this reaches until my wife began working for the government schools and began talking about the laws that she daily encounters.
Growing up I never realized what the truancy laws were. I never realized that the parental excuse and doctor’s written excuses were needed because I was being held hostage by the legal system. I always thought that this was merely part of the requirements of being a responsible student. I had no clue regarding the fact that missing class was a crime for which my parents would be held accountable.
A few years ago when I became aware of this I was truly horrified. I was deeply shocked to realize that this has been in force for all of my life apart from my awareness. I was very troubled to realize that this depth of mind control and social programming has been forced upon us for such a long time.
What is more is that the government schools are a farce and a joke. They are inefficient. They demand more and more taxes of the populace and accomplish less and less. This was as true when I was a youngster as it is today.
I was blessed to attend our church’s parochial school through the sixth grade. My first year in the government school was like a general review. The next year we were made aware of the advanced classes and I began learning something again. But there was also the continual bombardment of false information, especially in the history and social departments. I was being taught that the way to get laws changed is to challenge them by breaking them so that they would be reviewed by the courts. This was called civil disobedience and was the only real means taught for changing laws.
Thus these kids in Maryland first think of a walkout rather than talking to their parents and discussing the ways of addressing these issues through the school board and through demanding changes in legislation. Thus the government first teaches the students to be “activists” and law breakers, to cause civil unrest, and then arrests them for doing as they have been taught to do. That principal ought to be fired for his duplicity. The police chief also should be fired for promotion of terrorism.
Most importantly, the truancy laws should be overturned. The citizens should not be required by law to subject themselves to educational tyranny. If people do not want an education, or they simply do not want to be forced into government social modification programs, they should be free to seek their own means of education or even to remain ignorant if they so choose. Most of all, the entire populace should not be forced to pay for these social modification programs that always demand more money.
I often feel bewildered by the fact that the government’s religion is forcibly taught to the nation’s children and most people express no real objection. The result is that true freedom has been nearly entirely obliterated.
Just think, if parents decide that they do not want their children to be subjected to the government’s required (accredited) curricula, the government sends its enforcers to take the children from the parents. If a citizen does not want to support the government’s enforced indoctrination programs and refuses to pay the required program fees (property taxes), the government confiscates the citizen’s home and property. Parents who want to educate their own children must receive special permission from the government and must use the government’s curricula.
If the children object and stage a walk out, the government enforcers are sent with tasers and clubs and guns and attack dogs to hold them hostage.
Yet the people blithely ignore these government reeducation/indoctrination concentration camps and imagine that the freedom envisioned by the founders of this nation still exists. And this is just what is observed in the government enforced education system.
Is it time yet for us to become concerned?
This information does seem to shed some light upon what the usual candidates for office support with their support of the Federal Department of Education and “No child left behind.” That is for sure, no child is left behind, they all are dragged off together to the same locked down facilities. Well, at least we can take comfort knowing that the Obama, Romney, Gingrich, and Santorum have consistently pressed for more taxes to support the Department of Ed. Surely we can count on them for more of the same.
Ah, what a relief!
+ + +
Thursday, March 01, 2012
Starve Iran
Israeli officials: Starve Iranians to stop nukes
Israeli Officials Call for Starving Millions of Iranians
This is being compared to the refusal to send foreign aid to North Korea where the tyrannical dictatorial government committed and continues to commit atrocities on their people daily. North Korea’s leaders caused the starvation in North Korea.
There is a vast difference between saying “No” to the sending of foreign aid and saying “Yes” to trade sanctions and even military embargos against a nation, cutting it off from the world militarily.
Finding it difficult to justify outright military attacks on Iran, starvation is now being suggested as the means of killing the people.
Why? What have these people done? Whom have they attacked?
Who are the real monsters?
Yes, the Muslim leadership who are persecuting Christians with intensity and others as well, these truly are monstrous and evil. But is this reason for starving the entire populace? Is that not an even greater evil?
Recently many church leaders protested vehemently against the forced support of abortifacients and contraceptives. Church bodies angrily stormed Washington DC demanding to be exempted from violating their pro-life beliefs. Reports such as COP commends Synod president on religious-liberty statements boast with great pride regarding these actions.
OK. Very well. Good job boys!
In this same church body the new slogan and logo is: Witness, Mercy, Life Together.
Very catchy! Sounds wonderful!
I find myself wondering, will there be an outcry from these merciful ones regarding the globalist agenda to starve the Iranian children? Will they storm Washington DC to demand intervention on behalf of these children? Will they demand that their tax money not be used to help cut off food and supplies to the Iranian people?
Will they even publish a blog notice? Will they even send a letter?
Will they pray for the children in Iran? Will they pray for the parents who will struggle to find food for their starving children?
I am ashamed of the fact that in the past I often have turned a blind eye to such things as these. I am ashamed that I must admit that I did not cry out under the two Bush and the Clinton dictatorships and the unjust wars that they conducted and the other evils that they perpetrated.
Oh, I did cry out concerning at least some of the things, but with more of whimper.
Am I really doing anything more now? Is there more that I really can do?
Well, at the very least I believe that I can support candidates who likewise say that this is wrong, that warmongering is wrong, candidates with a record of opposing such evils, both abroad and at home.
- - -














